Question

Nowadays, there’s a lot of debate about single sex education since it has begun to regain its popularity recently. According to long term studies of children from around the world, students achieve more and learn better in single sex schools.
An Australian study of 270,000 students found that both boys and girls performed much higher on standardized(標準化) tests when they attended separate schools. During an experiment in Virginia in 1995, 100 eighth graders were separated just for math and science courses. Almost immediately, the girls began to achieve more, become more confident and take part more often in class activities.
In 2001, a British study concluded that nearly every girl regardless of (不論) her ability or socio-economic status performed better in single sex classrooms than co-ed ones. The study of 2,954 high schools and 979 primary schools showed that while boys at the lowest levels in study improved the most in single sex schools, single sex education was particularly beneficial (有益的) to girls. Every one of the top 50 private elementary schools and top 20 private high schools in Britain are single sex schools.
Girls became more confident in themselves as students and earned higher scores on their College Board and Advanced Placement examinations. A quarter of the female members of the US Congress and one-third of all female members of Fortune 100 boards graduated from all-women’s colleges.
While the statistics are not as dramatic for boys, however, boys tend to soften their competitive edge and become more cooperative in a single sex setting. They can just be boys and not worry about what the girls might think.
Single sex education has a pleasant way of encouraging children to be fearless, to be curious, to be enthusiastic --- in short, to just be themselves. Children are subjected (屈從于) to pressures from every quarter to become adults before they are ready to do so. They grow up too quickly. Why not let them be children for a few more years? Single sex education with its gentler, more controlled social atmosphere is just the right answer for many children.
【小題1】With the experiment in Virginia in 1995, the writer wants to show that       .

A．single sex education has become popular in recent years

B．the effect of single sex education on girls is immediate

C．students at separate schools are better prepared for standardized tests

D．both boy and girl students achieve more and learn better in single sex schools

【小題2】According to the article, which of the following statements about single sex education is TRUE?

A．Girls’ performances in single sex classrooms are determined by their ability and socioeconomic status.

B．In all-boys schools boys with the worst academic performances improved the most.

C．Single sex education was particularly helpful for boys.

D．There are more single sex schools than co-ed schools in Britain.

【小題3】 In the article, the underlined phrase “soften their competitive edge” probably means        .

A．act in a kindly manner	B．become less competitive
C．lose interest in something	D．take advantage of something

【小題4】 What is the main point of the article?

A．Ways to reduce pressure and help children grow.

B．The reason why girls perform better than boys at school.

C．The advantage of single sex education.

D．The development of single sex education in different countries.

Answer 1

【小題1】B
【小題2】B
【小題3】B
【小題4】C 

解析試題分析：文章主要介紹了單性教育的好處，引用了實驗結果來證明單性教育對于男生和女生的影響。
【小題1】B 推斷題。根據作者給出的實驗結果Almost immediately, the girls began to achieve more, become more confident and take part more often in class activities，可以推斷他想要告訴我們女生在單性教育中受益非常快，所以選擇B。
【小題2】B 細節題。根據文章內容，我們可以得知單性教育對于女生的影響較大，并且帶來的益處與學生的能力無關。可以排除A和C。D項并沒有給出足夠的證據，所以只有B正確。
【小題3】B 推理詞意題。劃線詞組字面意思是“柔化他們愛競爭的棱角”，即變得不那么愛競爭，所以選擇B
【小題4】C 主旨大意題。文章主要介紹了單性教育給男學生和女學生分別帶來的好處，并且推薦了單性教育的推廣，所以選擇C
考點：考查教育類短文
點評：本文推斷題居多，答題時在文章找到對應的地方，用筆進行標記，這有利于后期有時間檢查時可以立刻找到答案的位置。仔細理解作者所講的意思，再結合選項，通過排除法和自己對全文的把握，選出正確答案。